US Supreme Court Upholds TikTok Ban, Global Implications Emerge
The US Supreme Court has validated a ban on TikTok citing national security concerns, raising international scrutiny over TikTok operations.
The United States Supreme Court on Friday upheld a ban on the social media platform TikTok, which is scheduled to take effect on Sunday.
The decision marks a significant move as the court sided with concerns regarding national security over TikTok’s data collection practices and its relationship with a 'foreign adversary.' TikTok, owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, was required to transfer ownership to a US-based entity to continue operating; however, this transaction has not occurred.
As a result, the platform is set to become inaccessible to more than 170 million users in the US, with potential impacts on international users.
The Supreme Court ruled that the ban does not violate the First Amendment rights of users, providing grounds for its enforcement.
The move follows deliberations by both current and incoming administrations about extending the ban's deadline.
Although US law allows the president to extend the ban, President Biden appears poised to leave the decision to President Trump, who assumes office on Monday.
Reports from _ABC News_ indicate that Trump has considered suspending the ban through an executive order, potentially delaying its effect for 60 to 90 days.
Additionally, TikTok CEO Shou Chew plans to attend Trump's inauguration, as noted by _The Washington Post_.
Globally, TikTok continues to operate across the European Union without a comprehensive ban, although restrictions exist on devices used by EU Commission officials and in public sectors.
The EU has imposed stricter privacy and digital compliance requirements on the platform.
TikTok has faced scrutiny from the European Commission and Romanian authorities over allegations of election interference and breaches of EU digital regulations.
In Albania, temporary bans are also under consideration, reflecting widespread caution about the app's operations.
Despite bans, users have previously found workarounds, such as using virtual private networks (VPNs) to access the app, as occurred during regional unrest in New Caledonia.
It is expected that similar methods might be used in the US. Technological methods like modifying device DNS settings can also bypass local restrictions on the app, highlighting the complexity of enforcing platform bans in a digital age.
The decision marks a significant move as the court sided with concerns regarding national security over TikTok’s data collection practices and its relationship with a 'foreign adversary.' TikTok, owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, was required to transfer ownership to a US-based entity to continue operating; however, this transaction has not occurred.
As a result, the platform is set to become inaccessible to more than 170 million users in the US, with potential impacts on international users.
The Supreme Court ruled that the ban does not violate the First Amendment rights of users, providing grounds for its enforcement.
The move follows deliberations by both current and incoming administrations about extending the ban's deadline.
Although US law allows the president to extend the ban, President Biden appears poised to leave the decision to President Trump, who assumes office on Monday.
Reports from _ABC News_ indicate that Trump has considered suspending the ban through an executive order, potentially delaying its effect for 60 to 90 days.
Additionally, TikTok CEO Shou Chew plans to attend Trump's inauguration, as noted by _The Washington Post_.
Globally, TikTok continues to operate across the European Union without a comprehensive ban, although restrictions exist on devices used by EU Commission officials and in public sectors.
The EU has imposed stricter privacy and digital compliance requirements on the platform.
TikTok has faced scrutiny from the European Commission and Romanian authorities over allegations of election interference and breaches of EU digital regulations.
In Albania, temporary bans are also under consideration, reflecting widespread caution about the app's operations.
Despite bans, users have previously found workarounds, such as using virtual private networks (VPNs) to access the app, as occurred during regional unrest in New Caledonia.
It is expected that similar methods might be used in the US. Technological methods like modifying device DNS settings can also bypass local restrictions on the app, highlighting the complexity of enforcing platform bans in a digital age.
Translation:
•
Translated by AI
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
