In a significant escalation of tensions between Spain's executive branch and the judiciary, the government has vehemently criticized Judge Ángel Hurtado for initiating proceedings against Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz in an investigation related to leaked communications.

These communications involve the partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, President of the Community of Madrid.

As García Ortiz faces potential charges in a case concerning the revelation of secrets, the government maintains an unwavering stance of support for him.

Pilar Alegría, spokesperson for the government, has publicly affirmed their 'confidence and absolute support' for García Ortiz, asserting that there is 'NO CONCRETE EVIDENCE THAT IMPLICATES' the Attorney General.

Alegría also emphasized the government's disagreement with the decision to charge García Ortiz, underlining the absence of any substantial proof.

The government’s criticism mirrors past conflicts with judicial figures, reminiscent of disputes involving Judge Peinado.

In addition to denouncing the allegations against García Ortiz, government officials are redirecting the focus to the 'origin of the crime' surrounding alleged tax offenses committed by Ayuso's partner.

Notably, the government has criticized what it perceives as delays in the judicial process, remarking that nearly a year has passed since the alleged tax offenses took place, yet proceedings remain stalled.

This perceived inconsistency in judicial speed is contrasted with the swift actions concerning García Ortiz.

The dispute extends beyond legal procedures, with Alegría addressing what she describes as 'rumors, lies, and leaks' orchestrated by Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Chief of Staff for Díaz Ayuso.

According to Alegría, Rodríguez has purportedly misused regional resources to protect Ayuso and her partner.

Alegría's frustration was particularly evident when queried about Judge Hurtado’s assertion linking the leaked fiscal information and its subsequent appearance in media.

Judge Hurtado has suggested that governmental offices, including the Presidency, were involved in facilitating the leak to media outlets for ostensibly political purposes—claims resolutely disputed by Alegría. Hurtado notes, 'The same email dated February 2, 2024, circulated from the Office of the Attorney General to the Presidency of the Government, and from there to the media outlet El Plural.com.' Alegría rebuffed these claims as mere 'speculations,' resolutely stating, 'In a state governed by the rule of law, actions must be grounded on evidence, which is lacking in this case.'

This development underscores ongoing frictions in Spain concerning transparency, political influence, and the judicial independence that continues to stir debate across the political spectrum.