Spanish Government Challenges Supreme Court Over Lack of Evidence Against Attorney General
Education Minister Pilar Alegría Defends Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz Amidst Controversial Investigation
In a recent turn of events, Spain’s Education Minister and government spokesperson, Pilar Alegría, has publicly criticized the country’s Supreme Court for their decision to investigate the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, without substantial evidence.
During a press briefing following the weekly Council of Ministers meeting, Alegría asserted, 'There is no proof to indict the Attorney General.'
The investigation relates to an ongoing case concerning an alleged revelation of secrets involving Alberto González Amador, the partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the president of the Community of Madrid.
The Attorney General, along with Madrid’s provincial prosecutor, Pilar Rodríguez, and Diego Villafañe, the deputy prosecutor of the Technical Secretariat of the Attorney General’s Office, have been summoned as suspects, with court dates set for January 29 and 30.
The allegations stem from an incident on the night of March 13, 2024, when a confidential email reportedly transitioned from the Attorney General’s personal email to appearing on the website of Cadena SER within two hours.
This rapid dissemination of sensitive information is cited as evidence of unauthorized disclosure.
Alegría expressed unwavering confidence in the judicial system while simultaneously proclaiming her 'full support for the Attorney General.' She lamented what she described as a lack of 'concrete evidence' pointing to García Ortiz’s involvement, and questioned the origin of the alleged crime, suggesting it lies with Ayuso's partner.
The minister further accused Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Ayuso's chief of staff, of attempting to shield Ayuso and her partner through misinformation and 'threats,' aiming to divert attention away from the primary actors in the investigation.
'The rumors, lies, and leaks originate from Ayuso's chief of staff,' she stated.
Adding to the complexity of the case, Alegría noted that despite indications from González Amador’s lawyer of his willingness to settle criminal charges, he has yet to provide testimony, nearly a year after initial discussions.
As the situation unfolds, the government maintains a stance of 'maximum support and confidence in the Attorney General,' setting the stage for a contentious public discourse around judicial proceedings and political accountability in Spain.
During a press briefing following the weekly Council of Ministers meeting, Alegría asserted, 'There is no proof to indict the Attorney General.'
The investigation relates to an ongoing case concerning an alleged revelation of secrets involving Alberto González Amador, the partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the president of the Community of Madrid.
The Attorney General, along with Madrid’s provincial prosecutor, Pilar Rodríguez, and Diego Villafañe, the deputy prosecutor of the Technical Secretariat of the Attorney General’s Office, have been summoned as suspects, with court dates set for January 29 and 30.
The allegations stem from an incident on the night of March 13, 2024, when a confidential email reportedly transitioned from the Attorney General’s personal email to appearing on the website of Cadena SER within two hours.
This rapid dissemination of sensitive information is cited as evidence of unauthorized disclosure.
Alegría expressed unwavering confidence in the judicial system while simultaneously proclaiming her 'full support for the Attorney General.' She lamented what she described as a lack of 'concrete evidence' pointing to García Ortiz’s involvement, and questioned the origin of the alleged crime, suggesting it lies with Ayuso's partner.
The minister further accused Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Ayuso's chief of staff, of attempting to shield Ayuso and her partner through misinformation and 'threats,' aiming to divert attention away from the primary actors in the investigation.
'The rumors, lies, and leaks originate from Ayuso's chief of staff,' she stated.
Adding to the complexity of the case, Alegría noted that despite indications from González Amador’s lawyer of his willingness to settle criminal charges, he has yet to provide testimony, nearly a year after initial discussions.
As the situation unfolds, the government maintains a stance of 'maximum support and confidence in the Attorney General,' setting the stage for a contentious public discourse around judicial proceedings and political accountability in Spain.
Translation:
Translated by AI
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
